聖約翰學院欺凌事件掀激烈討論 退選幹事公開事件被斥破壞學院形象

2
10

關於聖約翰學院的欺凌事件,本報收到匿名讀者來函,揭露內部討論群組內就欺凌事件有激烈討論。有人就事件希望同學認真檢討,亦有人指責退選幹事破壞學院形象,稱「唔鍾意咪走囉」。

欺凌事件昨日被主流媒體廣泛報導,引起聖約翰學院學生及舊生激烈討論。有人留言質問涉事同學的同理心和常識何在,強調如果不滿候選人的表現應以選票表達。亦有人留言希望同學認真檢討。不過亦有留言反問是否退選幹事的說法和媒體的報導是否就是「事實」和「真理」。

更有人留下長篇文章,指候選幹事「無膽無信心就唔好搞咁多野/吃得鹹魚要抵得渴」,又針對其改革政綱指「唔鍾意又唔肯走/死都要改變傳統去迎合你自己」,稱「無文化嘅聖莊同一間普通宿舍無分別」。就候選幹事公開事件,該文章稱「打曬上status 博咩啫/聖莊嘅形象俾你整衰晒啦」。該文章獲過百個表情回應,更有相信是諷刺候選幹事的留言。

該位匿名讀者認為上述留言屬「嚴重欺凌comment」,反映了被欺凌的同學的苦況,「盼媒體可以加以整理,讓人反思裡面的comments同like」。

昨日聖約翰學院新一屆幹事之選舉,退選後剩餘的四名候選人均以約二十餘票贊成,五六十票反對,及約二十票棄權落選。

(截圖隱去所有人名)

2 COMMENTS

  1. There was a proposed chair. He had criticizers. They acted unchilvarously. Given the chance, he willingly publicizes the event in a demagogue-esque fashion, without room for rational discussion. Rational discussion is there enough within the college itself. So now it is politically incorrect to criticize this demagogue-esque public shaming? Ignoble, I must say. Democratic elections are anonymous for a reason. When both parties are corrupt, I long for an independent.

  2. This discussion is supposed to be within the closed group. I hope any media would respect the nature of this group and remain the discussion confidential.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here