過去一週係學生會羞恥的一週。呢個就係港大學生嘅水平,學生自治嘅成果?
1. 老實講,係食野定係飲酒定係開Party真係無咩所謂,大家開心就好了。但係,用完間房清返呢樣好基本掛,聽日有會開有野做,咪安排好人手清囉;就算無人清,有無得同人傾傾,俾另一間房人用啊。俾人擺上黎質詢已經尷尬了,份書面回應仲要唔馬上道歉,問到邊個要負責就走去講啲咩清潔工友working hour,連評議員都覺得係唔真誠。醜。
2. 如果係屬會出事,馬上就興師問罪啦。係評議會到竟然就係咪regret,幹事會無主動提案,其他評議員又拖拉到AOB,幹事會最後除左UAS1 同CAP之外竟然全投棄權。幹事會既然都承認自己疏忽,竟然不但無提出有咩懲處自己嘅方案,仲對regret motion 投棄權,絕對係坐實咗係同學同屬會幹事心目中卸膊、嚴人寬己嘅形象。
評議會:擾攘三小時方選出署理主席 評議會議事混亂連番違法遭前幹事炮轟
3. 好耐都冇見過啲人咁老實,第一句就話「因為唔合資格選評議會主席(CC),所以希望選個榮譽秘書(HS),好等我可以合返資格選CC喇!」然後仲不斷話我好有心做架、已經flow咗CC莊啦、想做21年度CC。但係問佢HS啲野,佢就話未flow莊呀,打算做Minimum(後來先改口)。評議會仲要為呢位人兄調議程俾佢先選HS。無言!
4. 犯錯多多少少都難以避免,畢竟大家都係業餘,好多坐咗係到都唔算耐,亦都唔寄望會有人將cons、bylaws、standing order倒背如流。但係原來CM01開始就已經錯,就真係難以置信——竟然咁耐以嚟無人發現?正如外務副會長提及,「追認」究竟可以點執行?以後屬會犯錯點好意思罰人呀?
5. 有前評議員表示今次係一場鬧劇,今日嘅討論除咗揭露評議員(當中不乏年資較長嘅評議員)嘅無知同低議事能力外一啲用都冇。好可惜,呢個其實係評議會嘅常態。好多時候大部分評議員又唔發言,發言前又冇準備,發言嘅內容又冇乜point,好多只係為咗盡責而出席(個「責」就係physically 出現係嗰會到)。都冇所謂了,開十個八個鐘冇乜人講野嘅會係你哋開、聽啲冇乜內容嘅說話係你哋聽、做啲戇居決定(大部分)都係你哋承受返。但係,有好多其他同學好努力做好自己嘅工作架,唔好搞到亡會,OK?
o85cbk
lski1c
Ahaa, iits fastidious dialogtue aout this piece oof writjng here at this webb site, I
hsve read alll that, soo aat ths tim me also commenting
here.
5z1kyf
Thanks for sharing. I read many of your blog posts, cool, your blog is very good.
It’s difficult too find educated people ffor this topic, bbut yoou soundd likje you kbow what you’re talking about!
Thanks
A persaon necessarily lend a hand to makoe ssignificantly articles I
might state. This is thhe first time I freqauented yourr webb psge and to ths point?
I amazed wwith the research you made tto crate this partticular publish extraordinary.
Magbificent task!